Mary K Hall

e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain private, confidential and/or privileged information, such as HIPAA Protected Health Information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone at 614-475-5305 ext 303 or by return e-mail. Thank you.

Este mensaje de correo electrónico, incluidos los archivos adjuntos, es para uso exclusivo del destinatario (s) y puede contener información privada, confidencial y / o privilegiados, tales como HIPAA información de salud protegida. Si no es el destinatario, tenga en cuenta que cualquier uso no autorizado, revelación, copia, distribución o la toma de cualquier acción basada en el contenido de esta información está estrictamente prohibida. Si usted ha recibido este mensaje por error, por favor notifique inmediatamente al remitente por teléfono al 614-475-5305 ext 303 o por correo electrónico de respuesta. Gracias.

-----Original Message-----
From: Anita Allen <aallen@opra.org>
To: opra_members <opra_members@opra.simplelists.com>
Sent: Thu, Jul 2, 2015 10:37 am
Subject: Companionship Exemption

Below is an update from Vorys on the status of the companionship exemption.

Anita Allen

Vice President

Ohio Provider Resource Association

1152 Goodale Blvd

Columbus OH 43212

614-224-6772 x110

614-655-0170 direct

614-224-3340 fax

The Trusted Voice for Providers Serving Ohioans with Disabilities for over 40 Years.

From: O'Brien, Michael F.
Subject: RE: Companionship Exemption

In late 2014, the DOL indicated that it would not start enforcing the new companionship regulations until July 1, 2015.

In separate rulings in late December 2014 and mid-January 2015, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia struck down the two parts of the new regulation that were opposed by health care providers, namely: (1) the provision excluding third party employers (such as home health care providers) from taking advantage of the exemption; and (2) the provision that narrowed the exemption to the point where almost no one could use it.

Those rulings were appealed by the DOL. A hearing was held before a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on May 7, 2015. Based on what I read, the judges gave no hints about how they might rule. At this point, we are waiting for a ruling. Whoever loses will probably ask the entire D.C. Circuit to review the case and/or will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. If the appellate court sides with the DOL, it may or may not stay enforcement of the regulations during the course of an appeal.

In other words, the July 1 date is meaningless at this point except to the extent it means that providers may have to move quickly if an adverse ruling is issued by the D.C. appellate court.

Mike

You are receiving this important information as a member service of the Ohio Provider Resource Association. Unless messages and/or replies are specifically directed, each posting/response is sent to the entire group. This group is open only to OPRA members, a large and diverse body. The views of individual list serve users do not necessarily reflect the view of the OPRA Board or Staff. To send a message to this list serve, please use the reply button. To reply only to the original sender, please respond to the email listed after "on behalf of" in the FROM line of the message header. Thank you.