Umm, firstly, how will this work for those individuals in Adult Foster Care/Adult Family Care who are transported to a workshop/job by a transportation-only provider who is not their day support provider, nor is their foster care/family care provider; so what else can they bill?

Neither AFO nor AFC can be billed for the same individual on the same day if billing for HPC.  If they do not have a 9-passenger/or better vehicle OR a modified vehicle, they can only bill the ‘per-mile’ rate.


Secondly, 5123:2-9-18 D.) (8) states “a provider shall not bill for ... homemaker/personal care provided by the driver during the same time non-medical transportation is provided” 
Does this mean that an HPC provider CANNOT drive them to work and bill the $4.40/15 minutes plus the 45-cents/mile? but ONLY bill 45-cents per mile? (4.40 is for Portage County)


Thirdly, I’m assuming that the “…except that billing may occur when NMT is being provided on behalf of…” means that you can bill this while you are performing an errand of some kind relating to the individual’s possible employment (such as with customized employment on the way to/from the job seeker’s home to get to know them/their skills/interests, on the way to/from a prospective employer for either an informational interview or application-type meeting, on the way to/from a training facility for whatever adaptive equipment the job seeker might need (resource ownership).


Also, forgive my naiveness, but there is a reference about ‘using natural supports’ whenever possible….I have never been overwhelmed with offers of free service; have you?  And, with the maximum 6-points on a license thing - doesn’t this restriction just hurt those that we are serving by reducing the number of available providers?  So what is the back up plan to insure that they get to work so that they can make money and have freedoms and social contacts?  Are there really an overabundance of people willing to transport?  I keep seeing RFP’s so I’ve assumed that drivers are quitting.

And commercial vehicles neither have to adhere to any of these rules nor are they subject to the pay rates - however, not all of the individuals we provide service for can use commercial vehicles for medical (and other) reasons.  


Thanks!

Teri


On May 27, 2016, at 1:41 PM, Lisa Mathis <lmathis@opra.org> wrote:

Gary,
It is still unclear as to where DODD will land concerning the budget limitations. I am getting the feel that budget limits will less rigid for those needing it adjusted in order to keep a job through individual employment support.   I will ask for clarification on this.
Thanks
Lisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Brown [mailto:GBrown@bradyware.com]
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 1:09 PM
To: Lisa Mathis <lmathis@opra.org>
Cc: 'opra_all_listserves@oprah.simplelists.com (opra_all_listserves@opra.simplelists.com)' <opra_all_listserves@opra.simplelists.com>
Subject: Re: FW: NMT

So when he says changing the service rate does that mean H/PC which would be counted against and individuals ODDP range?

On May 27, 2016 9:39 AM, Lisa Mathis <lmathis@opra.org> wrote:

HI All,

See attached document and email below concerning proposed DODD rules and rates for non-medical transportation. It seems there are pros and cons to these proposed rules. Please let me know your thoughts so I can respond next week.

Thanks,

Lisa





Good Morning Everyone,



I hope you all have had a great week and are ready for a relaxing holiday weekend. I’m writing with some updates to our work regarding transportation and to get your feedback on a NMT proposal from DODD.



Unfortunately, after months of believing that DODD would be adopting our recommendation for a per-trip rate for smaller vehicles, we learned earlier this week that they would not be adopting this change at this time.  The reasons are not completely clear to me, but are related to other changes that are apparently taking place to all transportation services statewide with ODOT.



DODD has, however, put forth a different proposal that they believe could still address some of our concerns and help align NMT with some of our other services.  The basic jist of this recommendation would be to make the Per-Mile NMT rates mirror the way that transportation is handled under HPC. Here is the summation of these changes.



-Vehicle and provider requirements for the per-mile trip would be loosened and mirror HPC transportation. These changes include the removal of the requirement for controlled substance checks, the need for fire extinguishers, communication devices and yearly inspections. Those requirements would now only apply to the per-trip rate.



-The requirement that you could not charge for both NMT and the service being provided (ADS, VOC HAB) would be removed and only apply to the per-trip rate.



-The mileage rate will be lowered to match the HPC rate as now the provider would be charging the service rate in addition to the mileage rate, same as HPC.





So while this recommendation does address some of our issues, including the increased ability to both use normal vehicles, either staff vehicles or a fleet of smaller vehicles, with less requirements around them, there are also some major things to consider.  Mainly, any NMT provider who IS NOT an ADS provider will have a significantly lowered mileage rate as they will not be able to bill the ADS in combination with this new mileage rate. DODD is currently pulling data to determine if there are indeed NMT providers who are currently billing NMT at the per-mile rate, aside from commercial providers who are billing usual and customary rate.



Please let me know your thoughts on this issue as we need to respond to this recommendation next week. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions. The new proposed rule language is attached below.



Thanks and have a great weekend,



Scott Marks, MSW

Community Opportunities Director

Ohio Association of County Boards

Serving People with Developmental Disabilities

73 East Wilson Bridge Road, Suite B1

Worthington, Ohio 43085

614-431-0616

Cell: 614-943-0975

OACBDD.org<http://www.oacbdd.org/> |

Facebook<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Ohio-Association-of-County-Boards/108445672565272> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/oacbdd> |

Linkedin<http://www.linkedin.com/company/ohio-association-of-county-boards>





You are receiving this important information as a service of the Ohio Provider Resource Association. Unless messages and/or replies are specifically directed, each posting/response is sent to the entire group. The views of individual list serve users do not necessarily reflect the view of the OPRA Board or Staff. To send a message to this list serve, please use the reply button. To reply only to the original sender, please respond to the email listed after "on behalf of" in the FROM line of the message header. Thank you.

________________________________

Unless the above message (“this message”) expressly provides that the statements contained therein (“the statements”) are intended to constitute written tax advice within the meaning of IRS Circular 230 §10.37, the sender intends by this message to communicate general information for discussion purposes only, and you should not, therefore, interpret the statements to be written tax advice or rely on the statements for any purpose. The sender will conclude that you have understood and acknowledged this important cautionary notice unless you communicate to the sender any questions you may have in a direct electronic reply to this message.
You are receiving this important information as a service of the Ohio
Provider Resource Association.  Unless messages and/or replies are
specifically directed, each posting/response is sent to the entire
group.  The views of individual list serve users do not necessarily
reflect the view of the OPRA Board or Staff.  To send a message to this
list serve, please use the reply button.  To reply only to the original
sender, please respond to the email listed after �on behalf of� in the
FROM line of the message header.  Thank you.